I finally tried Google Glasses

Originally published February 15, 2014

I never had the chance to try Google Glasses while I consulted at Google last year but my friend Judy just got a pair and I tried them this morning. Judy took the following picture of me wearing her glasses:

I was pleasantly surprised at how nice they were (after a couple of minutes getting them adjusted). I think that when Google finalizes the product and starts shipping them at a reduced price that the glasses will be popular for a variety of applications like:

  • Workers who need to keep their hands free
  • People with disabilities
  • Walking tours, supplying information about what a person is looking at
  • Hands free web search
  • Hands free photography and videography (but, the Google Glasses need an indicator light warning people when the camera is on!)
  • etc., etc.
I already "talk to my phone" to do web searches, get directions, etc., so talking to the glasses seems natural enough. I think that for general consumers that price point will make or break Google Glasses as a product. For professional applications, price is much less important, but I would bet the Google wants something more than a niche market. One issue I have is that both Android phones and iPhones are already so convenient with the Google Now app and Siri for voice control and getting information that the glasses really need to be inexpensive. It takes me a few seconds to take out my phone and ask Google Now a question - a few seconds saved with the glasses, but I only use Google Now to get information a few times a day so the glasses would not save me very much time.

Long term, wearable mobile devices will probably be very important to Google's business. This is just a guess, but: I expect Google Now (in some form) to eventually become the primary way that users access Google's various services and not only will Google Now be highly adaptable to individuals, but there will likely be different flavors for peoples' individual contexts like what kind of job they have and whether they are at work or at play. The big question I have is what the monetization strategy will be. It is difficult to accept that advertisements will be appreciated by users in voice interactions with mobile devices. It is true that the data Google gets from services like Google Now, on device GPS, etc. obviously helps target advertisements.

The other question I have (and only waiting a few years will answer my question) is: how is Apple going to compete? As a very happy owner of a MacBook Air and an iPad, I love Apple gear, and Google Now services run great on my iPad (and I assume also on iPhones) so Google probably does not care too much if people use iPhones or Android phones to access Google Now services. However it seems to me that Apple is leaving a lot on the table if they only go after the hardware and operating system market. I find using Siri on my iPad a nice experience but Apple does not have the same level of detailed information about me to compete with Google Now. It may be a bit of a stretch but I wouldn't be surprised if Apple ends up owning the market for people who want to maintain more privacy and Google will own the market of people willing to let Google have every bit of information about them in order to make money and provide services. Part of me would rather be in the "privacy consumer market" if Apple steps up and builds an ecosystem that protects people's privacy, and they could do this because they can make money without knowing a lot of personal details about people who use their gear. Google does not have that flexibility.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Dad's work with Robert Oppenheimer and Edward Teller

Robert Oppenheimer and Edward Teller facilitated my Dad getting a professorship at UC Berkeley when I was 3 years old. Oppenheimer left Berkeley but Teller was a good friend of my father and I remember him being in our home. Three weeks ago, my wife and I were just leaving to see the new Oppenheimer movie when my Dad called. He mentioned that when I was in grade school he was invited to give a talk at Princeton. After his talk Oppenheimer talked with my Dad and invited him to have dinner at his house. My Dad said Oppenheimer was not well (I think he died of throat cancer soon afterwards) but his wife Kitty carried the conversation. My Dad, Ken Watson, passed away 10 days ago on August 18, 2023.
Read more

Time and Attention Fragmentation in Our Digital Lives

  As humans we have evolved over a few million years to be both attentive and reactive to danger, live in social communities, and spend much of our time being in the present moment gathering and eating food and socializing. The behavior of rapidly changing short attention to content on social media, too many good short form things to watch on streaming video entertainment platforms, are all rewiring our brains in an unnatural and unhealthy way. I fight back, but in really simple ways that entail little ceremony: Almost every morning I spend 30 minutes scanning Hacker News (about 10 minutes), Apple News (about 5 minutes), and the remaining time on Twitter and Mastodon finding interesting new (mostly tech) things. I make notes in a temporary Apple Note: links of things I may want to research, try, or simply read that day. I like to get this all done at once, and then not feel like I need to interrupt my activities during the day to “catch up” on what is happening in the world. In a w...
Read more

I am moving back to the Google platform, less excited by what Apple is offering

I have been been playing with the Apple Intelligence beta’s in iPadOS and macOS and while I like the direction Apple is heading I am getting more use from Google’s Gemini, both for general analysis of very large input contexts, as well as effective integration my content in Gmail, Google Calendar, and Google Docs. While I find the latest Pixel phone to be compelling, I will stick with Apple hardware since I don’t want to take the time to move my data and general workflow to a Pixel phone. The iPhone is the strongest lock-in that Apple has on me because of the time investment to change. The main reason I am feeling less interested in the Apple ecosystem and platform is that I believe that our present day work flows are intimately wrapped up with the effective use of LLMs, and it is crazy to limit oneself to just one or two vendors. I rely on running local models on Ollama, super fast APIs from Groq (I love Groq for running most of the better open weight models), and other APIs from Mist...
Read more