I avoid installing software with sudo

As a Linux user since the early 1990s (and a longtime OS X user), it was easy for me to get in the "./configure; make; sudo make install" habit, but I don't think that this is such a good idea for two reasons:
  • Security: have you really read the source code to see what might be executed during "sudo make install"? I am constantly installing Ruby gems, infrastructure software, etc. and I often read code as an educational experience, but not for security. It is best to not run other peoples code as root.
  • It is much easier for me to rebuild systems from backups when I "./configure --prefix=/home/mark/bin" (or wherever, but in my home directory).
I used to like to keep my home directory fairly small so backups take up less space but now costs of external disks, remote storage like S3, etc. are so small, that it makes more sense to have my home directory to be more self contained.

I also like to develop customer projects under a single master directory. It is nice to have everything in one place: my application code, nginx, PostgreSQL (with data), Ruby, gems, Java, Tomcat, Sesame, Erlang, CouchDB, etc. - whatever a project requires to run. A top level shell script can set up the environment for each different project. This also makes cloning a customer's system to one of their alternative servers just a quick rsync away...


  1. Anonymous3:01 AM

    I also set the GEM_HOME=$HOME/.gem environement variable, but it's more for a practical reason. I don't like having to type sudo all the time I want to try out a new rubygem.

    Ideally, each untrusted software would have it's own sandbox where it can do no harm because in a single-user setup, the important data is in your home anyways.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Custom built SBCL and using spaCy and TensorFlow in Common Lisp

I have tried to take advantage of extra time during the COVID-19 pandemic

GANs and other deep learning models for cooking recipes