Yahoo and Google (on Slashdot): rooting for underdogs

Good article on Slashdot today: Yahoo's CFO saying that they don't need to be number 1 in search. She was probably sending a message to investors that Yahoo has many more revenue streams than just search, which makes sense. While I usually use Google search, I spend a more time on Yahoo: finance, local TV, and general news.

What I think that Google has is a great distributed computing platform (GFS, map reduce, etc.) that lets them quickly try out a lot of new ideas quickly and scale them up as needed. However other large companies also have great resources (e.g., the best computer scientist who I have ever worked with now works at Yahoo) and in any case, I expect to see most great new ideas come from much smaller groups.

Although playing for market share seems like a zero sum game, I don't think that it is. We don't even know what new and hot markets will exist in a few years. Creativity space seems infinite, to me.

Even with search, I tend to sometimes use 'the underdogs', mainly because I like to see competition, and trying competing products seems right. I think that the clustering search engine is both very cool and useful. I am a voracious reader, so using Amazon's search engine is fun because I get web, book, people, etc. search results.

Google provides a good service, and I am happy to see them rewarded with the largest market share - as long as perhaps a third of the market is left for other companies. If Google ever achieved Microsoft-like search market dominance, I would probably stop using them, even if they were technically the best. Anyway you look at it: free unfettered competition is good.


Popular posts from this blog

Ruby Sinatra web apps with background work threads

My Dad's work with Robert Oppenheimer and Edward Teller

Time and Attention Fragmentation in Our Digital Lives