IntelliJ does a fairly good job on supporting Scala Lift projects

The first few times that I tried experimenting with Lift I was disappointed with the development environment options. I ended up just running Maven from a command line with the tutorial projects open in TextMate.

I had a much better experience this morning when I decided to check out the recently released version 1.0 of Lift. This worked fairly well for me:
  • Create a demo project as per the getting started instructions
  • Build and run the project using mvn jetty:run from the command line, then stop jetty
  • Create a new IntelliJ project from existing sources (I had problems creating a project from a Maven POM file, but it was probably something that I was doing wrong)
  • Open the IntelliJ Maven Projects tab and click the "circular arrows" menu bar icon to look for POM files in the current project
  • I was then good to go: editing Scala code, editing Lift HTML template files, and running the mvn jetty:run target in the IntelliJ Maven Projects tab
To be honest, Rails is by far my favorite web app framework but I do find myself going back to server side Java for much better runtime performance for some projects. Since I have been working through the excellent Programming in Scala book, and generally enjoying Scala, Lift is perhaps looking like a good option for higher performance web applications where performance is more important that minimizing development costs. One thing that may convince me to stay with plain old server side Java (POSSJ) is any issues with running under the Java version of App Engine (which I am starting to like). Deployment platform selection (choosing between managed servers, App Engine, or Amazon EC2) needs to be done early because App Engine does have limitations that prevents its use for some projects, no matter how cost effective it is. POSSJ web applications that use JDO (or JPA) can be sort-of portable on and off App Engine, but Lift's use of Scala actors (usually implemented with threads) may not play well with App Engine. On the other hand, Amazon has been consistently lowering costs for using EC2, etc. so having greater flexibility may win out over some cost savings with App Engine. (By the way, if you write and use Hadoop map reduce data crunching applications, Amazon Elastic MapReduce really is incredible - the more I use it, the better I like it!)

Comments

  1. Ilya5:27 AM

    Hello, Mark.
    I wonder, what went wrong if create new IntelliJ project from pom.xml file?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mark Watson, author and consultant6:28 AM

    When I was creating a new project imported from an external model, I selected Maven, and could never get past the next dialog screen (the Next button was active, but did nothing when I selected it).

    I just solved the problem: I went into Preferences -> Mazen, updated all repositories that were showing, and then creating a new project worked fine.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Dad's work with Robert Oppenheimer and Edward Teller

Robert Oppenheimer and Edward Teller facilitated my Dad getting a professorship at UC Berkeley when I was 3 years old. Oppenheimer left Berkeley but Teller was a good friend of my father and I remember him being in our home. Three weeks ago, my wife and I were just leaving to see the new Oppenheimer movie when my Dad called. He mentioned that when I was in grade school he was invited to give a talk at Princeton. After his talk Oppenheimer talked with my Dad and invited him to have dinner at his house. My Dad said Oppenheimer was not well (I think he died of throat cancer soon afterwards) but his wife Kitty carried the conversation. My Dad, Ken Watson, passed away 10 days ago on August 18, 2023.
Read more

Time and Attention Fragmentation in Our Digital Lives

  As humans we have evolved over a few million years to be both attentive and reactive to danger, live in social communities, and spend much of our time being in the present moment gathering and eating food and socializing. The behavior of rapidly changing short attention to content on social media, too many good short form things to watch on streaming video entertainment platforms, are all rewiring our brains in an unnatural and unhealthy way. I fight back, but in really simple ways that entail little ceremony: Almost every morning I spend 30 minutes scanning Hacker News (about 10 minutes), Apple News (about 5 minutes), and the remaining time on Twitter and Mastodon finding interesting new (mostly tech) things. I make notes in a temporary Apple Note: links of things I may want to research, try, or simply read that day. I like to get this all done at once, and then not feel like I need to interrupt my activities during the day to “catch up” on what is happening in the world. In a w...
Read more

I am moving back to the Google platform, less excited by what Apple is offering

I have been been playing with the Apple Intelligence beta’s in iPadOS and macOS and while I like the direction Apple is heading I am getting more use from Google’s Gemini, both for general analysis of very large input contexts, as well as effective integration my content in Gmail, Google Calendar, and Google Docs. While I find the latest Pixel phone to be compelling, I will stick with Apple hardware since I don’t want to take the time to move my data and general workflow to a Pixel phone. The iPhone is the strongest lock-in that Apple has on me because of the time investment to change. The main reason I am feeling less interested in the Apple ecosystem and platform is that I believe that our present day work flows are intimately wrapped up with the effective use of LLMs, and it is crazy to limit oneself to just one or two vendors. I rely on running local models on Ollama, super fast APIs from Groq (I love Groq for running most of the better open weight models), and other APIs from Mist...
Read more