Why P2P like Bit-Torrent needs legal protection

P2P technologies allow end users to provide bandwidth for file sharing instead of relying on large central servers that cost the content providers money. I frequently use Bit-Torrent to grab ISO images for Linux installs. Some people break the law using cars or guns, but we do not outlaw cars and guns - we just punish people who use them illegally. It should be the same way with P2P: if someone makes copyright movies available, that is wrong, and should be punished. Making the technology illegal is also wrong.

I think that one reason the big media companies lobby Congress to outlaw P2P technologies has nothing to do with current illegal use of these technologies. Instead, I think that they see a long term threat as entertainment markets are opened up to independent producers who find that their production costs are slashed using digital media and close to free distribution via P2P. A lot of people do not seem to mind commercials in network TV so why not fund Indy movies with a few embedded commercials? Same idea for musicians: produce low cost music videos and distribute them via Bit-Torrent (and if they get to be popular, add a few short targeted commercials).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My Dad's work with Robert Oppenheimer and Edward Teller

Time and Attention Fragmentation in Our Digital Lives

Ruby Sinatra web apps with background work threads