Monetizing Twitter and Facebook

I read this morning that Twitter just secured a $250m VC infusion of operating funds. Good news for Twitter management and users (my handle on Twitter is mark_l_watson) but they do need a revenue model. Facebook (my handle there is my gmail.com address mark.watson) at least runs adds.

I am not very active on either Twitter or Facebook but they are fun. As a consumer, I would not mind at all paying a low fee (like $5/year) for no-advertisement service and to keep them in business long term. As a developer I like to see open APIs with free low-volume use of the APIs and modest costs as use scales up.

The issue is how to get people to start paying for services that they have been enjoying for free. Flickr (mark_watson) got me to upgrade to a paid account when I hit the 200 photograph limit for free accounts. I use Google gmail, documents, and calendar as part of both my business work-flow and my personal life-flow but I have yet to upgrade to a paid $50/year account. I think that Google needs something less expensive for individuals who would still like to pay for some form of guaranteed quality service. (That said, I am sure that I buy enough stuff via Gmail advertisements that they are making money from my use of their services.) BTW, if you base business on third party web applications, make sure you back up locally! (Google makes this easy with their gdata web service APIs.)

Since I am writing a book on Web 3.0 I have been increasingly looking at the web as an application platform and I look forward to more services like Twitter and Facebook (but more focused on many separate market niches) that are both financially solvent long-term and with open (and inexpensive to use) APIs.

The issue of up-time and long term viability is huge for developers building services by aggregation of other services. I was writing example programs yesterday (for my new book) demonstrating clients using SPARQL to query public RDF repositories and was disappointed at how many SPARQL endpoints were "down", at least temporarily. Any Web 3.0 type applications that aggregate information and services must obviously be resilient to unavailable services, and that is just part of the challenge. I think that the key thing is to have not only a technology infrastructure but also a business infrastructure for Web 3.0 applications.

Comments

  1. AnjanBacchuDev6:49 PM

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Dad's work with Robert Oppenheimer and Edward Teller

Robert Oppenheimer and Edward Teller facilitated my Dad getting a professorship at UC Berkeley when I was 3 years old. Oppenheimer left Berkeley but Teller was a good friend of my father and I remember him being in our home. Three weeks ago, my wife and I were just leaving to see the new Oppenheimer movie when my Dad called. He mentioned that when I was in grade school he was invited to give a talk at Princeton. After his talk Oppenheimer talked with my Dad and invited him to have dinner at his house. My Dad said Oppenheimer was not well (I think he died of throat cancer soon afterwards) but his wife Kitty carried the conversation. My Dad, Ken Watson, passed away 10 days ago on August 18, 2023.
Read more

Time and Attention Fragmentation in Our Digital Lives

  As humans we have evolved over a few million years to be both attentive and reactive to danger, live in social communities, and spend much of our time being in the present moment gathering and eating food and socializing. The behavior of rapidly changing short attention to content on social media, too many good short form things to watch on streaming video entertainment platforms, are all rewiring our brains in an unnatural and unhealthy way. I fight back, but in really simple ways that entail little ceremony: Almost every morning I spend 30 minutes scanning Hacker News (about 10 minutes), Apple News (about 5 minutes), and the remaining time on Twitter and Mastodon finding interesting new (mostly tech) things. I make notes in a temporary Apple Note: links of things I may want to research, try, or simply read that day. I like to get this all done at once, and then not feel like I need to interrupt my activities during the day to “catch up” on what is happening in the world. In a w...
Read more

I am moving back to the Google platform, less excited by what Apple is offering

I have been been playing with the Apple Intelligence beta’s in iPadOS and macOS and while I like the direction Apple is heading I am getting more use from Google’s Gemini, both for general analysis of very large input contexts, as well as effective integration my content in Gmail, Google Calendar, and Google Docs. While I find the latest Pixel phone to be compelling, I will stick with Apple hardware since I don’t want to take the time to move my data and general workflow to a Pixel phone. The iPhone is the strongest lock-in that Apple has on me because of the time investment to change. The main reason I am feeling less interested in the Apple ecosystem and platform is that I believe that our present day work flows are intimately wrapped up with the effective use of LLMs, and it is crazy to limit oneself to just one or two vendors. I rely on running local models on Ollama, super fast APIs from Groq (I love Groq for running most of the better open weight models), and other APIs from Mist...
Read more